Thursday, 12 November 2015

Lyric Analysis - Tom Odell - "Grow Old With Me"

This song could be interpreted from either a male or female point of view however because the singer of the song is a male and the music video which accompanies the song is also shot from a male perspective where the man seems to be singing the song to the woman as though it was written for purposely for her.

I can feel you breathing
With your hair on my skin
As we lie here within
The night

I'll pull the sheets
When it's cold on your feet
Cause you'll fall back to sleep
Every time

The above two verses suggest that they are very content in each other's presence and that they appreciate one another's company. The imagery that these lyrics create is that they are simply laid together in a peaceful surrounding and are enjoying just being together rather than having to be surrounded by other people to have a good time. They appreciate the simple, little things that they do for one another and do not need anything extravagant to show the other that they love them or to feel that they loved by the other.

Grow old with me
Let us share what we see
And oh the best it could be
Just you and I

Here, in the chorus, he is asking the girl he is singing to, to spend the rest of her life with him and this shows the audience how much she means to him and how much he loves her. He is saying that he wants to share all of his life experiences with her and nobody else because with her they will be the best that they can be, and this reinforces the point above - that they are happy doing anything as long as they are doing it together.

And our hands they might age
And our bodies will change
But we'll still be the same
As we are

We'll still sing our song
When our hair ain't so blonde
And our children have sung
We were right

These two verses are about the couple recognising that their experiences in life will shape who they become and also accepting that their bodies will change over the years as they grow old, but they put this aside and promise each other that they will still always see the person that they fell in love at the start when they were young and will always be attracted to each other.  
The part about their children suggests that they will have brought their children up well and have acted like good role models throughout their lives because by singing the same song as their parents it suggests that they want to be like them in their older age as well.
They'll sing
Grow old with me
Let us share what we see
And oh the best it could be
Just you and I

(chorus)

And the hairs they stand up
And my feet start to thump
Yer the feeling is dreaming
Around

You'll be the one
Make me hurt, make me come
Make me feel like I'm real
And alive

The song, throughout, has a sense of innocence because it is sung from the perspective of a young person because they talk about becoming old in the future which suggests that they are still young, the video confirms this. 
However, the verses above are the only two verses that describe the physical side of their relationship as they have strong sexual connotations and they describe how they make one another feel but also showing that they are a mature couple who have respect for and are committed to each other.

Grow old with me
Let us share what we see
And oh the best it could be
Just you and I

Grow old with me
Let us share what we see
And oh the best it could be
Just you and I


(chorus x2)

Tuesday, 10 November 2015

Media Language Theorists

What is Media Language?
Every medium has it's own language that it uses to to communicate meaning. TV uses verbal and written language as well as moving images and sound. They are called languages because they use familiar codes and conventions which are genrally understood; for example scary music builds fear in the horror genre, a close up camera shot could infer intimacy, and a big headline on a newspaper signals significance.

Understanding the grammar, syntax and metaphor system of media language increases our appreciation and enjoyment of media experiences as well as helps us to be susceptible to manipulation from the media.

Evaluating media language is an evaluation of all the micro-elements (sound, editing, cinematography and mise-en-scene) and how they have created meaning to inform us about genre narratives, representation/ideology and targeting of audiences.

Charles Sanders Peirce (1931)
"We think only in signs." - signs take the form of words, images, sounds, odours, flavours, acts or objects but such things have no intrinsic meaning and only become signs when we invest them with meaning.
Anything can be a sign as long as someone interprets it as signifying something - referring to or standing for something other than itself. We interpret things as signs by subconsciously relating them to familiar systems of conventions.

Ferdinand de Saussure (1974)
Ferdinand de Saussure put forward a dyadic (2 part) model of the sign. He said a sign is composed of:
- a signifier: the form which the sign takes
- the signified: the concept it represents

A sign can be:
An icon/iconic - a mode in which the signifier is received as resembling or imitating the signifier.
An index/indexical - a mode in which the signifier is not arbitrary but is directly connected to in some way to the signified.
A symbol/symbolic - a mode in which the signifier does not resemble the signified but which is fundamentally arbitrary or purely conventional.

In semiotics, denotation and connotation describe the connection between the signifier and signified.

Roland Barthes (1967)
He noted Saussure's models of the sign focused only denotation at the expense of connotation which was left to sub-theorists.

John Fiske (1982)
Denotation is what is photographed, connotation is how it is photographed.

Fiske and Hartley (1982)
Barthes 'myths' were the dominant ideologies of this time, the 1st and 2nd order of significance, denotation and connotation combine to produce ideology which is classed as the 3rd order of signification.

Roman Jakobson (1956) and later Claude Levi-Strauss
Emphasised that meaning arises from the differences between signifiers are of two kinds; syntagmatic (concerning positioning) and paradigmatic (concerning substitution).





Friday, 6 November 2015

Genre Theorists

Daniel Chandler Theory (2001)
Argues that the word 'genre' comes from French (originally Latin) word for 'kind' or 'class'. The word is widely used in rhetoric, literary theory and media theory to refer to a distinctive type of text. 

Barry Keith Grant (1995)
All genres have sub-genres which means they are divided up into a more specific category that allows audiences to recognise them specifically by their familiarity and recognisable characteristics.

Steve Neale (1995)
"Genres are not 'systems' but processes of systemisation" - ie. they are dynamic and evolve over time.

Jason Mittell (2001)
Argues that genres are cultural categories that surpass the boundaries of media texts and operate within industry, audiences and cultural practices as well. In other words, industries use genre to sell products to audiences. Media producers use familiar codes and conventions that very often make cultural references to society.

Rick Altman (1999)
Genres give the audience a set of pleasures:
Emotional Pleasures - particularly significant when they generate a strong audience response.
Visceral Pleasures - gut responses defined by the films stylistic construct e.g. kinetic speed = excitement.
Intellectual Puzzles - offers the pleasure in trying to unravel a mystery or puzzle. 

David Buckingham (1989)
Any theme may appear in any genre:
Fear of the unknown - anything different is scary
Horror = modern day fairy tale - plays in which people who break rules serve a punishment. 
Sex = death - sex before marriage is immoral and must be punished. 

Thursday, 5 November 2015

Visual Essay (Audience)



Applying Stuart Hall's Theory
Stuart Hall's theory suggests that media texts are encoded by the producer which means that whoever produces the text fills the product with values and messages (ideologies) that are decoded by the different audiences and perceived in different ways depending on the audience, not always in the way the producer intended.
The ways the audience will react in one of 3 ways:
1. Dominant/Preferred - the audience view the media text in the way the producer intended. The audience agree with the ideology and message behind the text.
2. Negotiated - this is a compromise between the dominant and the oppositional readings, the audience accepts the views of the producer but also has their own input and understanding in relation to the text.
3. Oppositional - the audience fully reject the meaning intended by the producer as they do not agree with it and so create their own reading of the text.

I think the intended message from the producers of this music video is to show that society has a distorted image of perfection which leads us to put unnecessary pressure on young women for them to look a certain way. Although men are self-conscious to, in my opinion self-consciousness is more of a problem for women as we are the more judgemental gender and have more of a tendency to compare ourselves with another which lowers self-esteem. This leads to girls going to extreme lengths in order to achieve results that they believe will make them happy however this, more often than not, leaves them both physically and mentally unhealthy.
The producers of the video also intended to show the less-glamorous side to an industry which seems so attractive to younger girls, almost trying to dissuade them from becoming involved in it all as it becomes addictive in that if you don't win the first time round, you don't want to give up until you do win just to prove to the other women that you are capable of doing it and perhaps even to yourself so that you feel as though you are good enough and you are able to achieve something.

The kind of audience that would respond to this video with the dominant/preferred view could perhaps be those who work in this industry themselves as they would be able to empathise with how the women in the video are feeling. I also think that women are more likely to sympathise with the emotions of depression, unhappiness, self-hatred and lack of confidence as I think
that most women have felt like this at some-point in their life, by no means am I saying that men don't ever feel like this but I feel that is more common within women than in men.

The dominant/preferred view is:
- to show how ignorant we, as a society, are to an industry that we are so quick to judge
- to break the stereotype that people place upon the women that are involved in the beauty/fashion industry as they expect them to love themselves and be overly confident and look down on others who are perhaps more insecure or less glamorous than they are however the video shows that they are just as, if not more, self-conscious as every other woman.
- to show that stereotypes are untrue (as a conclusion of the point above), this is shown where a girl who is extremely thin pulls at the skin around her ribs, which are visible, implying that she thought she was fat and still not good enough.

The negotiated view is:
- although the audience are made to feel sorry for the women in the music video they have chosen to become involved in this industry so they have brought it upon themselves which decreases the amount of sympathy the audience has for them if it seems self-inflicted.
- shows women as the self-conscious and weaker gender and men as the dominant and more confident gender, controlling the women and making them feel small.

The oppositional view is:
- the video only shows this industry in a negative light and does not consider the positive sides of the industry and so people who do not have much knowledge will only see and believe the negative side which is shown to the audience.
- it could be a bad influence on young girls who watch this video as it not only suggests to them that have to be stick thin and flawless in order for society to accept them, but it also gives them ideas as to how they can lose weight in order to be like the women they see in videos.
- the women shown in the music video are not good role models for the younger audience whom this could be seen by as there are scenes of violence between the women which may suggest to young girls that it is okay to behave like this and treat each other in this way.

Applying the Hypodermic Needle Theory
This theory suggests that the mass media could influence a very large group of people by 'shooting' or 'injecting' them with appropriate messages. The audience is passive and believes it therefore they give the desired response. When media was not as advanced as it is today and when this theory was put forward, people believed what they were told because there was no other source of information to check that what they are being told is true.
The cons of this theory are now that this theory is invalid because I how media has evolved to be at the level it is today. Other things include:
- not everyone consumes media in the same way
- more up to date theories have proved that audiences are no longer passive
- we, as an audience, have more knowledge of media conventions therefore we can tell when something does not seem completely legitimate.

I think this theory directly applies to the music video I have chosen to analyse because it has a very strong message as discussed in my essay on narrative, and by overwhelming the audience with ideas and messages (ideologies) they feel obliged to conform to and believe what they are being told is true therefore an institution can manipulate an audience.
Throughout this video the audience are only shown the negative side of the industry and the video ignores any positive aspects it may have, as a result of this, as the audience, we create a feeling of resentment towards an industry that mistreats women who put in so much hard work and make so many sacrifices ion order to be successful and as a result also making that industry successful as well yet they get so little respect in return and we also sympathise with the women. 
The ways in which the producers show this industry in a negative light is by showing the audience both visually and through the lyrics of the song. In my opinion, the point in the video where we realise really how happy the character Beyonce is playing really is. The imagery that follows the clip of her saying that she 'aspires to be happy' is so powerful and connotes exactly how she feels.

The image to the left portrays connotations of distress, unhappiness, and shows that she is fed up and miserable in what she is doing and the audience can tell this through her facial expressions - frowning, holding her head in her hands and from her lips it look as though she is sighing. Her lack of make up reveals that her eyes look dark which makes her look exhausted and distressed as well as isolated and vulnerable which is reinforced by the fact that she is the only person in the shot and the background is blurred out so the audience is unsure of her location at this point in the video.



The image to the right is much more abstract in comparison to the image above. The audience could interpret this image as Beyonce's thoughts on the inside rather than taking it literally and implying that she is drowning. Although watching Beyonce sink deeper into the water literally looks like she's drowning I think it has a much deeper meaning. It represents that she is losing/has lost control, her hands that appear to be covering her ears act like she is attempting to block out everything that she has become so consumed into.
The dark blue and black tones of the water in the image show that she is both mentally and physically in a dark place and blue filter over the image makes it look cold and eerie which is there main reason that the audience can infer that she is not in a nice place and isn't somewhere they would want to be themselves.

Of course, there are more areas of the video that 'inject' the audience with negativity however I used these two as examples because I feel that they are some of the most powerful examples and that they represent the 'Hypodermic Needle Theory' in the best way.

Applying Blumler and Katz's Theory
Blumler and Katz's Theory looks at "what people do with the media" rather than "what the media does to people" as well as the motives of the people who use the media, or in other words - 'Uses and Gratifications'. They suggest that audiences have social and psychological needs which generate certain expectations. The audience is the active participant, it allows them to make choices on what they want to consume.

The model is broken down into 4 different needs which are:
1. Surveillance - based on the fact that people enjoy having the feeling that they have a better understanding of what is going on in society and the world around us.  
2. Personal Identity - explains how being a subject of the media allows us to confirm the identity and positioning of ourselves in society. When consuming a media product we associate and relate to the product directly, making us feel gratified and able to relate to a product.
3. Personal Relations - for example, people use television to form a companionship as there will always be something on TV to suit your mood. People also form personal; relationships with characters whom they feel they can relate to and get attached to story lines they are involved which explains why people cry during sad films - they feel a connection to the character.
4. Diversion - we use media whether it be TV, film, social networking, or magazines to divert our thoughts and take our minds of everyday life.

I feel that the reason why people watch music videos is for the chance to understand the song through the narrative of the video because this can help to either make the meaning clearer to an audience or to further deepen their initial thoughts about the song. By just listening to a song  an audience can make up their own interpretations and their own imagery to go with the song based on what the song means to them and if they can relate to the song in any way through a situation they have been in before, A music video, on the other hand, is how the artist feels about their song and it is their chance to intercept the audiences initial thoughts and replace them with how the artist wants the song to be received by the audience, in terms of the imagery they create whilst listening to the song, how it makes them feel, how to link it with real life scenarios etc.

One way in which Beyonce's music video link to the 1st need in Blumler and Katz's theory, Surveillance, is because the music video, in a way, is educational as it gives the audience a 'behind the scenes' perspective of the fashion/beauty industry, an industry the general public are usually only able to read about in magazines or see on television. The after watching the video the audience would feel as though they have a better understanding of what really goes on in that industry thus making them less susceptible to all the thing they read in the media and more aware of what is actually going on in society. This could be damaging to the reputation of the fashion industry because anything Beyonce does has the potential to reach an audience of millions because of her worldwide popularity and people may not be so supportive of it after consuming the video because they have a much better understanding of the impact it has on those who are immediately involved in it. (Perhaps this was the intended purpose of the producers of this video? - links to Stuart Hall Recption Theory)

Both the 2nd and 3rd 'needs' in Blumler and Katz's theory, personal identity and personal relations are quite similar as personal identity recognises that, as a society, we use the media as a way of finding out more about ourselves such as where we come from, stereotypes surrounding our social group and perhaps also the reasons behind why we do as we do. In my opinion, this music video would appeal more to a female audience than it would to a male audience because the main theme of the song is insecurity and being afraid of what others think about you and although this is a problem for boys and for men, I feel that it is a much more common occurance in every day life for women therefore they will be able to relate to it much better.
Personal relationships is about using the media to form companionship not only with the characters that we may see on television but also in real life, using the media to friendships and social groups. An example of this which doesn't necessarily link to Beyonce's music video alone but does link to Beyonce as an artist is the name that she has given to her fan base to identify as - The 'BeyHive', by having a name all of Beyonce's fans can come together under this fan base and form a social group on the basis that they all have a strong interest for beyonce and her music  and they all have at least that in common, although it doesn't happen very often there are rare stories of people finding their 'best friends' through being a fan of the same band or artist. Others include Directioners (One Direction), Little Monsters (Lady GaGa), Swifties (Taylor Swift) and Smilers (MIley Cyrus) to name just a few.

Another reason as to why an audience would choose to consume a music video as well as the one above, is to so with the 4th 'need' in Blumler and Katz's theory which is diversion. The same as the reason people choose to consume television programmes, people also choose to consume music videos as a way of diverting their thoughts and taking their mind off of every day life, so in a way the media, in numerous formats, acts as a form of distraction and additionally using it as a way to fill our time when we are not at work or at school.

Wednesday, 4 November 2015

The Class's Response to 'Smack My Bitch Up - The Prodigy (1997)' Applying Stuart Hall's Reception Theory

Dominant/Preferred
Demonstrate how people make assumptions on stereotypes.
Not to stereotype genders based on activities which are shown on the video, because women can act in the same way.
Demonstrate that stereotypes are not fixed and to show people that women and men are more similar experience than we think.
To make a statement and to confront stereotypes and gender roles, to show drug and alcohol abuse in a negative way.
To break stereotypes, women can be violent.
To demonstrate that women are not as innocent as an audience may assume.
To show that stereotypes can sometimes be untrue.

Negotiated
Because of media understanding they have a more open minded views, they understand the dominant message but are more willing to deconstruct and find a deeper meaning.
A clear understanding of dominant message but some unnecessary content.
Dominant message is understood but is disrespectful to women.
A good message has been portrayed by breaking the gender stereotype but it is very inappropriate, the full product is needed to understand the dominant message but people may switch off before the end as too graphic.
The audience may understand the message but do not agree with the way it has been portrayed.
They understand that women can spiral out of control as well as women but the view that is portrayed is very unlikely.
The band/institution is trying to make a point but it doesn't need to be portrayed in such an extreme and graphic way. 
The purpose is understandable but the content did not need to be as obscene, can still be understood in a less graphic way.
It is an inaccurate representation of women act in society.
It shows that men and women behave in the same way but do not agree with the way it was shown.
The message of the video is understood but if this video was shown to the wrong audience a negative impact would be had (moral panic, increased crime rate and drug abuse?)

Oppositional
It was disgusting the way women are portrayed.
People with religious ethics would be offended.
This would be rejected by people of upper social class as it deepens the negative view they already have on people that are of a lower social class.
Could be seen in a literal way which results in a negative view of society.
The way women are portrayed could be offensive to lesbians.
Unsuitable for a majority of audiences.
People may not watch it all the way through because of the behaviour our shown therefore they will not understand the full intended message.
It is obscene and rude due to the sex and violence, from a mans point of view if they do not realise it is actually a female protagonist.
It is degrading towards women as it is unlikely a women would act in this way.
The product may be rejected as people do not want to see women in this way as they prefer the dominant stereotype of women and do no like being confronted with an image that challenges this.
It is upsetting and goes against a traditional views and values (ideology).
Bad role models are created.
Might instigate more antisocial behaviour.
The older generation are highly likely to oppose.
Too many adult themes.
People who do not engage in that sort of behaviour will not want to/cannot relate to it.

Summary - dominant
An audience may have a dominant understanding if the message is clear.
An audience of the same age/same culture will relate to the product more as the relate to and understand the narrative in some way.
It is relevant to society.
An audience chooses to consume the product so there must be something they like about the product.

Summary - negotiated
The audience may not have had the same life experience.
May not understand the narrative and so cannot understand the dominant message in the intended way.
Age may vary the understanding and reading of the product.
Do not understand the messages making it unclear what the dominant reading is supposed to be.

Summary - oppositional
The product has controversial themes.
Disagree with the messages in the video.
Dislike the genre.
Cannot relate to the culture - no understanding.
Is not reflective of society.
Different cultures have different understandings.

Blumler and Katz Theory (Audience)

The 'Uses and Gratifications Theory' asks "what do people do with the media?" rather than "what does the media do to people?"
The model looks at the motives of the people who use the media as the audiences needs have social and psychological needs which generate certain expectations. The audience is the active participant because this allows them to make choices on what they want to consume.

The model is broken down into 4 different needs:
1. Surveillance
2. Personal Identity
3. Personal Relations
4. Diversion

Surveillance is based on people having a feeling that they have a better understanding on what is going on in society and the world around us.

Personal Identity explains how being a subject of the media allows us to confirm the identity and positioning of ourselves in society. When consuming a media product we directly associate to the product making us feel gratified and able to relate to the product

Personal Relationships (with media) is when people use media forms such as TV to create a companionship - there will always be something on to suit your mood and will never let you down (like a friend).

Diversion is simply when an audience consumes a media product to take their mind off their everyday lives.

Hypodermic Needle Theory (Audience)

The theory suggests that the mass media could influence a very large group of people by 'shooting' or 'injecting' them with appropriate messages. It had a powerful effect on its audiences in the 1940's and 1950's because radio was becoming increasingly popular, as were persuasion industries such advertising. because the audience os passive, they believe exactly what they are told and give the effect that the producers desired. 
The lack of media available at that time meant that audiences were much more easily influenced than an audience would be today because they had no other sources to check the information against or to hear differently from however in today's society, we could check social media, we are able to trace the source of an article, or we could simply ring up family or friends to check that they had heard the same thing and see what their opinion was on the situation. 

An example that puts this theory into context is the 'panic' that was caused by the 'War of The Worlds' broadcast in 1938. The broadcast was performed in the style of news bulletin so that people  were more likely to believe what they were being told and had no reason to question it. This had the desired effect on the audience because it caused panic across America as they genuinely believed that they were under attack and aliens were going to take over the world, this is because they had no reason no to believe it and they had no other media sources to check the information against or to be told any different, nor could they contact other people to see what they thought was going on.


(Audio of the 'War of the Worlds' Broadcast - 1938)

Criticisms of this theory include:
- The theory is invalid for modern day society
- Not all audiences/people consumes media in the same way
- more up to date theories have proved that audiences are no longer passive
- Nowadays, we have a much better understanding of media conventions therefore we are able to detect whether something is believable or not and we are able to research and look deeper into something if we have reason to doubt it